Sonnie Ekwowusi

You may be well aware that two Bills are presently pending before the National Assembly, Abuja. The first Bill is the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020 pending before the House of Representatives. This Bill is solely sponsored by House Speaker Femi Gbajabiamila. The second Bill is the Nigerian Emergency Health Bill, 2020 pending before the Senate. This Bill is sponsored by 104 Senators out of the 109 Senators at the Senate. The two Bills are being given expeditious hearing by both Houses of the National Assembly. It is instructive that the two Bills pending before the two Houses are substantially similar. One wonders what informed the duplication in the two Houses. Besides, American multi-billionaire and African population controller, Bill Gates, has been fingered as bankrolling the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020. Paradoxically, the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) is vehemently opposed to the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020. The NCDC says it is not privy to the Bill. In fact, the Director-General (DG) of the NCDC, Dr. Chikwe Ihekweazu, recently said that it is unwise to sponsor such a Bill at this time of the coronavirus pandemic when Nigerians are still preoccupied taking precautions to avoid being infected by the virus. In his own words,” I am personally not in favour of drafting a Bill in the middle of a crisis”. Now, if the NCDC and Dr. Ihekweazu are objecting to the Bill, why is the National Assembly bent on processing a Bill that would empower the NCDC and Dr. Ihekweazu? We gather that the COVID-19 Vaccine would be produced in 2022. So, why is the National Assembly in a hurry to pass in 2020 a law that would regulate COVID-19 Vaccine that would be produced in 2022 or may never be produced at all?

Aside the above slur and dent on the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020, the entire Bill is replete with multiple draconian sections that infringe on your fundamental human rights as enshrined in our 1999 Constitution and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights. This is why yesterday more than 84 Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in Nigeria formally lodged their protest in Abuja calling for the withdrawal of the Bill. Also yesterday, about 15 CSOs in Lagos organized a Press Conference at Ikeja, Lagos demanding for the immediate withdrawal of the Bill. Apart from fragrantly violating the right to private and family life, right to freedom of conscience and religion, right to peaceful assembly, right to freedom of movement, right to dignity of human person as enshrined in our 1999 Constitution and the African Charter, the CSOs argue that sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Bill violate the right to privacy, confidentiality between doctors-patients. Can you imagine the Bill granting nebulous and arbitrary  powers to the Health Minster, health officers, diseases control agents and enforcement officers to arrests any person, demolish buildings which in their views are helping to spread infectious diseases. Section 15(1) (2) (3 a-d) of the Bill empowers the Health Minister to declare any premises as an isolation area; and the DG of NCDC to impose movement restriction within the area. Section 20 empowers the DG of NCDC to stop any meeting or gathering likely to lead to increase in the spread of infectious diseases. Section 24 of the Bill empowers any enforcement officer to arrest you in the street if he thinks that you are suffering from COVID-19 or any infectious diseases. Section 25 empowers any enforcement officer to obtain a court order to destroy any building in which he thinks a case of COVID-19 or infectious disease has occurred. So, the Bill is in favour of the kind of jungle justice recently wrought by Rivers State Governor Ezenwo Wike when he ordered the demolition of two hotels in Rivers State for allegedly violating the lockdown order. Section 47 of the Bill stipulates that parents must vaccinate their babies. Sections 48, 49, 51 stipulate that in the event of an outbreak of and infections diseases such as COVID-19 or other diseases in an area or anywhere you who is reading this can be arrested anywhere and be given compulsory vaccination with or without  your consent. Above all, the Bill is a surplussage. It is aimed at duplicating many existing laws in Nigeria. Our challenge in Nigeria over the years is not lack of laws: it is the enforcement of existing laws. Therefore needless churning out more laws.

More importantly, the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020 was copied verbatim from Singapore. Commenting on this, the London Times, May 18 2020 writes that the  Infectious Diseases Bill 2020 about to be passed into law in Nigeria is 98% carbon copy of the Singapore’s Diseases Act 1977 which was enacted 43 years ago. The questions are: Are the social realities in Singapore same with that of Nigeria? No. So, why must our legislators ignore the social realities in Nigeria and proceed to Singapore to copy their Diseases Act 1977 ?  What stops our lawmakers from brainstorming and producing a Bill that conforms to the social realities in Nigeria? What is even baffling is that despite the London Times indictment of Nigeria for carbon-copying the Singaporean Law Speaker Gbajabiamila is rationalizing the plagiarization.

Ostensibly in reaction to the aforementioned drawbacks of the Bill, the Joint Committees on Health Services, Health Institution and Justice of the House of Representatives has recently advertised that a Public Hearing on the Bill shall hold on Wednesday 10th June 2020 and 11th June 2020 respectively at the National Assembly, Abuja. However, nothing has been heard on when the Senate will conduct its own Public Hearing on the Nigerian Emergency Health Bill, 2020.  The public is encouraged to actively participate in the said Public Hearing to ensure that this Bill is defeated.  The 1999 Constitution stipulates that “sovereignty belongs to the people of Nigeria from whom government through this Constitution derive all its power and authority”. 

Therefore the National Assembly must exercise its law-making function in line with the aspirations of the Nigerian people.  *Vox Populi Vox Dei* (The voice of the people is the voice of God). Section 4 (1) (2) of the 1999 Constitution empowers our National Assembly to make good laws for the people of Nigeria not for Bill Gates or Speaker Femi Gbajabiamila. Therefore neither Bill Gates nor Speaker Gbajabiamila should pressurize or coerce the people of Nigeria to endorse the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020. Only recently an Italian lawmaker Sara Cunial delivered a speech on the floor of the Italian parliament passionately appealing to her fellow Italian legislators to reject any plans for compulsory vaccination against Covid-19. She said told them that Bill Gates was one of the main culprits behind the vaccination drive, if not the pandemic itself. She accused Bill Gates of sterilizing millions of women in Africa and paralyzing hundreds of thousands of children in India.

Also recently the US Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case against the America Centre for Disease Control, Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci and some multi-billion Pharmaceutical Companies. The court ruled that there is no proof that the Federally-approved vaccines have been tested and safe for human beings. The court also ruled against compulsory vaccination for everybody.  I would like to commend the aforesaid Cunial speech and the US Supreme Court judgment to Nigerian Federal legislators. Our Federal legislators should allow the Nigerian people to freely assess the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020 in the light of the socio-cultural, political and economic and religious realities of the Nigerian people. No attempt should be made to impose the Bill on the Nigerian people. After all, government exists to serve the citizens not vice-versa. The citizens are not the slaves of government. Therefore the people have a right to reject the Infectious Diseases Bill 2020. This is democracy in action. In fact, the value of democracy stands or falls with the fundamental values that it embodies and promotes. A democracy that violates the inalienable human rights of the citizen is despotism par excellence even though it externally wears the toga of democracy.  A democratic government ought to conduct its activities in line will and aspiration of the people. *Vox Populi Vox Dei*.

You may also like...